[Back to Social Challenges]

Introduction

This is just a placeholder: a proper article is required here.

But one quick point about the UK National Health Service (NHS): almost everybody agrees that it is in need of radical reform, so let's start to spell out what that reform might look like.

For a start, we need to change the primary aim.  The NHS currently aims to deliver cost-effective treatment, but it should aim to deliver prompt and effective treatment.

The current system seeks to maximise the effectiveness of the NHS resources, which are primarily the people - that is, the NHS people.  What this means is that outside every Doctor's waiting room there is a queue of people waiting to see the Doctor.  This ensures that the Doctor is never waiting to see a patient, never under-utilized.  It means that the Doctor is constantly working as hard as possible, which produces burnout and early retirement, or a move to a country which treats its Doctors more humanely.  And it means the patients have to wait - wait for an appointment, and then wait in the queue; it delays treatment, which often results in the condition getting worse (and thus more expensive to treat), and also results in the patient experiencing a reduced quality of life and often a reduced performance at work as well.

In seeking to maximise the effectiveness of the NHS, we inevitably create many other costs which are carried by the individuals who are suffering, and also by society as a whole in lost production - all the people sitting in queues in the hospitals and Doctor's Surgeries could be doing something useful with their time, if they were not forced to sit and wait for their name to be called.

The current system aims to be cost-effective, but it is measuring cost-effectiveness the wrong way: it is looking at resource management, when it should be looking at service delivery: sickness imposes a cost, to the individual and to society, and we should be seeking to minimise that cost.  We should be focussing on prompt and effective treatment: making people better in the most effective way, as quickly as possible.

The cost of delivering the service is irrelevant: what matters is the real cost - which includes both the cost of delivering a healthcare system and the cost of sickness.  According to the Financial Times, in February 2024, sickness cost UK businesses £138.3bn in the previous 12 months - and this is only one part of the real cost.  People leave work or cut their hours to care for a sick partner or child, the self-employed simply don't work.  And then there is all the opportunity cost of what the sick people could be adding, both in work and in volunteering and other activity.  And there is the knock-on effects: sick people don't generate as much economic activity (they don't go out for meals or to the pub, or cinema, or theatre), so other businesses suffer from lost revenue.  And that is before you start to think about the actual human cost, including all the unnecessary suffering.

Other countries manage to deliver prompt and effective healthcare: it's not impossible.  But we have to want to do it, and we have to believe it is possible.

One important area of debate concerning healthcare is the question of assisted dying, which has been recently raised again by the November 2024 Private Members' bill.