Transport

[Back to Physical Challenges]

There is a great deal needing to be said about transport here, but the bottom line is that our transport urgently needs to become carbon-neutral and much more energy efficient.

One clear objective is that our cars must be powered by electricity, rather than petrol or diesel. However ...

Buying a new electric car is not a good plan, unless you need to replace your car: the best strategy is to run your existing car for as long as you can, because the energy and carbon cost of building a new electric car is massive.
Even if you need to replace your car, there is a significant issue about what happens to your old car. There is a good chance it will be exported to the 'third world', where it will continue to pollute and emit carbon dioxide; see the next point.
We need to move away from car use, especially in urban areas; it will be far harder to provide rural areas with adequate public transport. We must invest in public transport in 'third world' countries, where they cannot afford to create the necessary infrastructure - see the Vox article for more on this issue.
Many car journeys involve just one or two people, and a far more efficient form of transport for those journeys is possible - see Lit Motors for one possibility.
We seem to be assuming that electric cars will all run on batteries. While battery technology is constantly improving, this is not a viable strategy without some massive breakthroughs: we will not have enough raw materials to build all the batteries which will be needed, and we will not be able to provide dedicated charging points for all the cars owned by people in our cities. Electric cars will need to be recharged overnight, so the owners will need to have guaranteed overnight access to a reliable charging point, and there is not enough space in most inner city residential streets for the required infrastructure. So we must plan for a significant number of private cars to get their electricity from a fuel cell, and we must start to build the necessary fuel cell infrastructure alongside the battery charging infrastructure. I have argued that this needs to start with converting fleets of lorries to run on fuel cells.
Also see this article on why motorway cables are probably not the best way to decarbonise lorries.

Public transport also needs to be upgraded.

We need a viable plan to create a rapid urban transport system in Bristol.

The ideal method of urban transport - when walking is impractical - is the bicycle.

Cycle lanes are essential on all major routes, keeping the bicycles away from both the pedestrians and the powered transport.
We also need practical and reliable bicycles: see this video for why we need to learn from the Netherlands - Why Dutch Bikes are Better.

Flying is the worst means of transport, both in terms of energy use and the wider impact on the environment.

We need to stop subsidizing air travel.
We need to aim to reduce the amount of transport by air.
But we will not completely stop flying, so we need to improve the design of aircraft, and power them in a sustainable way.

Shipping uses more energy every year than flying does, for the basic reason that far more goods are transported by water than flown. So decarbonising shipping is also a major priority.

Push bikes are ok in cities (providing they're not too hilly).

But electric railways and rapid transit systems are what is needed to move people and goods around.

Batteries for cars are currently very expensive and the size of a mattress. They last about 10 years. The cost of replacement (and the fact that the technology would have moved on) probably means cars will have almost no value at that point. I can see a major problem in that it's quite possible any savings in carbon emmissions during the running of the car would be negated by the discarding and replacement of the actual vehicle owing to battery costs.

Infrastructure for electricity is a huge problem. Imagine the load on a local substation (and the cables under the street or on the poles) when a household is using their ground/air source heatpump to heat their house, and they also have two or three electric cars plugged in overnight. It simply won't work without a complete renewal of the infrastructure.

Also what about the problem of cables and connectors on already crowded pavements in cities where people rarely have private parking or garaging. The problems to overcome are enormous, and not even under serious consideration at present.

You need to be a member of Just Human? to add comments!

Join Just Human?

Comments

Mark Collins March 14, 2022 at 11:29am

Push bikes are ok in cities (providing they're not too hilly).

But electric railways and rapid transit systems are what is needed to move people and goods around.

Batteries for cars are currently very expensive and the size of a mattress. They last about 10 years. The cost of replacement (and the fact that the technology would have moved on) probably means cars will have almost no value at that point. I can see a major problem in that it's quite possible any savings in carbon emmissions during the running of the car would be negated by the discarding and replacement of the actual vehicle owing to battery costs.

Infrastructure for electricity is a huge problem. Imagine the load on a local substation (and the cables under the street or on the poles) when a household is using their ground/air source heatpump to heat their house, and they also have two or three electric cars plugged in overnight. It simply won't work without a complete renewal of the infrastructure.

Also what about the problem of cables and connectors on already crowded pavements in cities where people rarely have private parking or garaging. The problems to overcome are enormous, and not even under serious consideration at present.

This reply was deleted.